A controlled public benchmark and transparency kit for autonomous software repair. Mutation boundaries, immutable tests, a rollback engine, and pytest before/after telemetry — all evidence-verifiable in the public repo. Successes and failures are preserved honestly.
Evidence-first · Fails closed · Honest claim boundaries
LEONA's public evidence is split into two tracks because they measure different things. Deterministic replay validates the harness. True-LLM repair measures actual model-generated patch attempts. Both are in the repo. Both carry explicit claim boundaries.
Five OSS micro-repository deterministic mutation-replay probes (toolz, tqdm, python-sortedcontainers, cachetools, boltons) also passed 5/5. These are controlled mutation-repair probes against real project structures, not claims of upstream defects. See evidence/oss-report.md.
LEONA's repair governance is not a slogan — it's a set of concrete enforcement points that produce the telemetry above. Each one is verifiable in the public benchmark output.
Only authorized source files may change. Every attempt to modify a non-authorized file is rejected and recorded.
Test files are never modified by the repair pipeline. Test-file write attempts are rejected at the chokepoint.
Failed patches revert cleanly. Rollback events are counted and reported as first-class telemetry.
Hallucinated patches, syntax-invalid output, and schema violations are caught before any file is touched. The pipeline fails closed.
Every repair attempt runs pytest before and after. Test pass/fail evidence is the ground truth, not the model's self-report.
Public artifacts use generalized labels (local-14b-code-model). Internal model IDs and provider tuning remain private.
The dlglabs/leona-public repo is the controlled transparency layer. It includes everything below. Private orchestration internals, repair heuristics, provider routing, and enterprise control paths remain separate.
validate_public_evidence.js).DLG Labs is in controlled release. We welcome serious technical review, evaluation conversations, and partnership inquiries grounded in the evidence above.